Chris
Ware’s graphic novel Jimmy Corrigan, the
Smartest Kid on Earth explores the importance of family lineage and how the
failures of one generation are inherited by subsequent generations. The text
links the importance of familial bonds to an individual’s development and
well-being, and in doing so offers the quality of upbringing as an explanation
towards why Jimmy exhibits an exacerbated, more manifest form of the Oedipus
complex.
The
visual component of the graphic novel allows the presence of family lineage to
be clearly communicated through the use of images, as each of the Corrigan men possess
identical facial features. These common traits – such as their sunken eyes,
round head, and plain features – clearly mark them as a Corrigan, and resurface
through generations of the family. The most compelling example of this appearance
occurs as Jimmy and his father meet for the first time. Characterized by beady
blue eyes, vacant expressions, and identical outfits, the narrative presents
each Corrigan in succeeding frames to highlight the similarities between the
two men (37). In effect, this passage cements the importance of one’s origins
and genealogy, and seems to offer an explanation of why Jimmy is who he is. Beyond
the use of physical appearance to communicate the importance of lineage, the
text uses issues of fatherhood and abandonment to explore the cyclical nature
of family heritage and its impact on the next generation. Patterns of abuse and
neglect resurface through each generation, as Jimmy’s great-grandfather is depicted
abusing his grandfather through corporal punishment (159) and lying to him
about returning home (268). Following these actions, the narrative explores the
subsequent consequences of Jimmy’s grandfather’s upbringing, as Jimmy’s own
father is also depicted as an absent and unlikeable man who was absent during
Jimmy’s childhood (190). Through detailing the failure of two father-son
relationships, the narrative communicates the important role of fatherhood and family
lineage in shaping one’s development. The destructive effects of abandonment
and neglect are exhibited in two identical scenes in the narrative, where Jimmy
and his grandfather are each depicted lying in bed with their eyes wide open -
anxious, isolated, and restless (57; 166). The explicit similarities between
these two generations highlight how the behavior and mistakes of one generation
have a cyclical effect on the subsequent generation, and demonstrate the
integral role of family lineage and parenting on an individual’s development.
Through
emphasizing issues of family lineage and the inheritance of a prior
generation’s mistakes, the narrative sheds light on why Jimmy exhibits a more
manifest form of the Oedipus complex. Sigmund Freud argues the Oedipus complex
is a universal urge present in all human beings, and the only difference is
that psychoneurotics “are only distinguishable by exhibiting on a magnified
scale feelings of love and hatred to their parents which occur less obviously
and less intensely in the minds of most children” (Freud 814). Accepting
Freud’s claim that certain individuals express stronger and more visible degrees
of the Oedipus complex than others, the text offers family lineage as a
contributing factor that might explain these individual differences between
those who do and do not overtly express Oedipal urges. The importance of family
lineage and ancestry is symbolically represented through Jimmy’s crippled leg. In
Oedipus Rex, Oedipus is marked with a
swollen foot because he was bound and abandoned as a baby. Symbolically, Oedipus’s
limp marks him as an outsider, and is a physical representation of the
crippling effect of his past on his own identity. Comparable to Oedipus
himself, Jimmy is depicted waiting for his father in the airport with a limp
and a bad leg, and uses crutches for a majority of the narrative (30). This
image reveals Jimmy as a marked, Oedipal individual, and the presence of his
crippled leg symbolically illustrates the debilitating effects of Jimmy’s
family’s history and its role in shaping his Oedipal urges. The extent of these
desires are revealed through the graphic novel’s form, which enjoys the ability
to use both text and images to communicate a story. In the first meeting between
Jimmy and his father, the text and images of the narrative diverge to reveal
Jimmy’s manifest and latent construals of the encounter – as the dialogue
details the awkward conversation between father and son, the images of Jimmy’s
parents having sex reveal his latent thoughts and worries (37-38). The graphic
novel’s ability to communicate both the explicit and latent construals of the
situation expresses Jimmy’s Oedipal desires, as he proceeds to imagine himself viciously
killing his father while remaining on the bed with his mother (37). Therefore,
understanding the importance of parenthood and family lineage ultimately sheds
light on the nature of Jimmy’s obsessive relationship with his mother (13;
231). The origins of Jimmy’s Oedipal desires seem to emanate from the Corrigan lineage,
as Jimmy’s great-grandfather is depicted before a mirror, fantasizing about killing
his own father (231). Here, the mirror plays a symbolic role – as Jimmy’s
grandfather imagines himself shooting his father, the mirror allows him to take
the role of the father, fulfilling his Oedipal desires to assume the role of
the patriarchy. In exploring the importance of family lineage and the cyclical
consequences of past generations, the narrative offers the impact of one’s
ancestry as an explanation for the evident, heightened presence of the Oedipus
complex within Jimmy.
Works Cited
Freud, Sigmund. "The
Interpretation of Dreams." The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism.
Ed. Vincent B. Leitch, William E. Cain, Laurie Finke, Barbara Johnson, and John
McGowan. 2nd ed. New York City: WW Norton &, 2011. 814-845. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment